Lord of the FliesLiterary

Do you want a similar Paper? Click Here To Get It From Our Writing Experts At A Reasonable Price.

Requirements: CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING TO WRITE 3 PAGE PAPER ON…IF YOU DO NOT COMPLETE ALL THE EXACT REQUIREMENTS YOU WILL NOT BE PAID AND WILL REFUND MY MONEY.ALSO, MUST NOT HAVE ANY PLAGURISM, COPIED MATERIAL!!!!

 

Lord of the FliesLiterary Analysis Paper

Write a well-developed 3 page minimum literary analysis paper on one of the following questions/topics. This should include an introduction (with a clear thesis), three body paragraphs and a conclusion. Each body paragraph should have at least 2 pieces of textual evidence for support and each piece of support should have a warrant. You MUST also include a piece of literary criticism aboutLord of the Fliesand connect it to your topic. This means that you will be using two sources and will also need a Works Cited page. Be sure to proofread your paper for careless errors that spell and grammar check did not find.

Choose one of the following:

1.Compare the societies of Ralph and Jack.

2.Analyze a specific character from the novel and explain his importance to the novel. (Ralph, Jack, Simon or Piggy)

3.Trace the symbolism that surrounds the conch shell. Why does it eventually have to be destroyed?

4.What does the use of masks symbolize? How does the adult society mask itself according to Golding? (in your opinion)

5.Trace the use of satire and what does the use of satire say about society/civilization?

6.Analyze any other symbol and discuss its importance to the novel.

7.Analyze the setting and discuss its importance to the novel.

8.Analyze one of the following themes: 1) the need for civilization, 2) innocence and the loss of it, 3) the loss of identity, 4) power, 5) fear of the unknown, 6) the indifference of nature, or 7) blindness and sight.

Requirements:

Times New Roman

12 font

Typed, double-spaced

3 pages minimum (not 2 and a half)

No contractions, slang, or 1stor 2ndperson pronouns

Be aware of punctuation

Interesting title — NotLord of the Flies

Heading information: Name, Mrs. Duensing, Class-Hour, Date (Day Month Year)

Do you want a similar Paper? Click Here To Get It From Our Writing Experts At A Reasonable Price.

As the associate director of staffing services for your state’s department of civil service, you must create a flyer regarding the changing public service system. The flyer will be sent to

Do you want a similar Paper? Click Here To Get It From Our Writing Experts At A Reasonable Price.

As the associate director of staffing services for your state’s department of civil service, you must create a flyer regarding the changing public service system.

The flyer will be sent to the staffing departments throughout the state to inform the departments of the system’s history and potential challenges within the management of their workforce.

Create a flyer of a minimum of 750-words. In the flyer, address the following:

How has the public service system evolved over the last 100 years?
What major events and decisions were important to the evolution? Include a timeline of your examples.

What are some of the challenges of managing the public workforce in the 21st century? Explain how these challenges came to be and how they may change in the future. Describe your vision for dealing with these issues.

Note. Please use graphics and images to help support your content.

Do you want a similar Paper? Click Here To Get It From Our Writing Experts At A Reasonable Price.

“The Persuaders” Documentary

Do you want a similar Paper? Click Here To Get It From Our Writing Experts At A Reasonable Price.

Group Assignment 4: “The Persuaders” Documentary

A great PBS Frontline documentary on the persuasion industry, in both advertising and politics. This website offers a variety of instructional materials, and to watch the documentary, click on the “Watch the full program” link on the right top corner of the screen.

Group assignment 4 is to watch the movie “The Persuaders” and answer the 5 questions at the bottom of this page (underneath the link for the movie). Post your responses (just one set of answers for the entire group) in your group’s discussion board, under the title “Final Answers.” The movie is enjoyable, and lasts about 90 minutes. Make your responses as long as they need to be to answer the questions adequately. This assignment is intended to help you to understand the content of the chapters, and to give you some ideas to ponder in completing the last homework assignment. Good luck!

Click on the link below to watch the video:  http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/persuaders/

The questions you must answer for group assignment 4:

1. When creating an ad for “Song Airlines,” Spade says that he did not want to make the ad a “literal delivery of a benefit.” What does he mean by this and why is he trying to avoid it?

2. Why is studying cults useful in understanding persuasion and how to market a product?

3. The French advertising guru Coltaire Rapaille believes that the power of words is not in their literal definitions. Where/how do words acquire their meanings and associations, according to Rapaille?

4. Rapaille wants to know more about the “reptilian mind” of the consumer more than the “mammalian mind.” Why does Rappaille find the reptilian mind more important when it comes to persuasion?

5. Rapaille once told a French company that “In America, the cheese is dead.” Frank Luntz says that he watches a lot of television to find the “pulse” or “vibe” of Americans. What main point about the effective ability to persuade are they both making?

Do you want a similar Paper? Click Here To Get It From Our Writing Experts At A Reasonable Price.

introduction for a proposal Solar ponds

Do you want a similar Paper? Click Here To Get It From Our Writing Experts At A Reasonable Price.

I wrote a little introduction about solar ponds and i want you to check it and add on it
Electrical power generation from solar ponds using thermoelectric generators

Do you want a similar Paper? Click Here To Get It From Our Writing Experts At A Reasonable Price.

Evaluating a Scholarly Source

Do you want a similar Paper? Click Here To Get It From Our Writing Experts At A Reasonable Price.

The purpose of this assignment is to read, summarize, and evaluate a scholarly text (see link below).  The writer should include a brief summary of the text followed by an evaluation of that text as a useful and/or effective document for research writing.

In general, an evaluation of a scholarly source should offer an informed assessment of the text’s effectiveness based on its stated or assumed purpose.  The writer should include evidence of careful reading and note taking in a very brief summary of the text and a thorough review and assessment of the content of the article and the author’s rhetorical strategies used to present it.

The brief summary should identify the thesis statement, claim, or main idea of the text, evidence and key points to support the claim, and a description of the author’s purpose, tone, and style.  The summary should also identify the primary audience(s) of the text.

The evaluation of the text should include some or all of the following observations and considerations:

•    How clear and/or convincing is the author’s purpose for writing?  What position or argument does the author present?  What is the thesis statement or claim?
•    What evidence does the author offer to support his or her claim or position?  Does the evidence effectively support that claim?  What additional information could the writer offer?
•    What form does the author use to present her or his ideas?  (Examples: a proposal, a report, an essay, a letter, a PowerPoint presentation, a web page.)  How does the form of the text serve the author’s purpose for writing?  Is it the most effective form?  Why or why not?
•    Is the article part of a continuing debate or controversy?  What positions have people taken in the past?  How effective is this text when placed in conversation with other texts?

•    Who are the intended audiences for the text?  Who else might care about the author’s position? Describe one or more of the audiences.  Do you believe the author reaches that group?
•    Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the writer’s argument based on your membership in the reading audience.  Does the text reach you?
•    Describe the author’s tone and/or style?  Identify words or phrases that illustrate that both.  What effect does the tone and/or style have on the author’s purpose?  What effects do the author’s tone and style have on the audience?
•    How useful would this article be for a research project? Is the author credible? What qualities or strategies make the author credible? Is the evidence reliable? Identify reliable evidence and your reasons for selecting it.

LENGTH/FORMAT:  Four to five pages, double spaced; use correct MLA style for all integrated quotes and references, and include a works cited entry in correct MLA format.’

Do you want a similar Paper? Click Here To Get It From Our Writing Experts At A Reasonable Price.

Why do you think Henrietta did not want her family to know about her illness?

Do you want a similar Paper? Click Here To Get It From Our Writing Experts At A Reasonable Price.

Why do you think Henrietta did not want her family to know about her illness?

Do you want a similar Paper? Click Here To Get It From Our Writing Experts At A Reasonable Price.

Is the way that families are portrayed in TV sitcoms helping society

Do you want a similar Paper? Click Here To Get It From Our Writing Experts At A Reasonable Price.

Research Paper Topics

Pick one of the following topics to research and write about.

 

–          Is the way that families are portrayed in TV sitcoms helping society

–          Should there be a ban on assault rifles

–          Should advertising have limits set on it, or is whatever method used to sell items ok

–          What is the correct view of the origin of life’

–          Is genetic engineering beneficial to mankind (also GMO)

–          What will be the effect on the current and future generations having grown up with social media

–          Should the US grant amnesty to illegal immigrants

–          Many have said that American society has shifted from “doers” to “takers”. Do you agree or disagree?

–          Should the government be responsible to take care of the health of all of its citizens? In other words is Obama care a good idea or not?

–          Are women in America truly better off than they were prior to the Women’s Liberation movement of the 1970’s

–          Should models be airbrushed or not for advertisements

–          Come up with your own (this must be approved by me first)

Do you want a similar Paper? Click Here To Get It From Our Writing Experts At A Reasonable Price.

Drug Makers Seek Clues to Side Effects in genes

Do you want a similar Paper? Click Here To Get It From Our Writing Experts At A Reasonable Price.

Drug Makers Seek Clues to Side Effects in genes

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Seven of the largest pharmaceutical companies have formed a group to develop genetic tests to determine which patients would be at risk from dangerous drug side effects.

The new group, the International Serious Adverse Events Consortium, is one of a wave of cooperative research efforts sweeping the drug industry, as companies come under pressure to cut costs and increase their success rates in developing medications. The Food and Drug Administration has encouraged the formation of such groups.

If drugs could be withheld from patients who have a genetic risk for serious side effects, it could not only protect the patients but might help manufacturers get their drugs approved or avoid having to remove them from the market.

“We have to remove drugs that are clearly offering patients benefits because a handful are getting these severe adverse reactions,” said Duncan McHale, a researcher for Pfizer and co-chairman of the consortium’s scientific management committee.

The consortium will start by trying to find genetic predictors of two side effects — serious liver toxicity and Stevens-Johnson syndrome, a rare but potentially fatal blistering of the skin. Both effects are associated with numerous drugs.

Mr. McHale said the side effects were rare enough that no single company had enough cases and enough patient DNA samples to find genetic risk factors. “The way to do the best science is for all to work together to get as many cases as possible,” he said.

Arthur Holden, the chief executive of the consortium, said the companies would contribute guidance and money. The actual research will be done by contractors and academic laboratories, including one at Columbia University.

The results will be put into the public domain, with none of the corporate sponsors having early access or being able to patent the findings, he said. Once the results are made public, any company or laboratory would be able to develop and sell genetic tests to predict side effects.

In addition to Pfizer, the companies involved are Abbott LaboratoriesGlaxoSmithKline,Johnson & Johnson, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis and Wyeth. Others might possibly join later. Mr. Holden said the companies would each pay about $1 million a year.

Pharmaceuticals makers, following the lead of the semiconductor and other industries, have increasingly collaborated on research in areas that are considered outside the main realm of competition. Often, these involve basic genetic studies of drug safety.

One of the first, started in 1999 and also run by Mr. Holden, was a consortium that searched for DNA variations among people, then put the variations into the public domain so that no one could patent what the companies considered raw scientific information.

The F.D.A. has encouraged such groups, even helping to start some of them though a program called the Critical Path Initiative, which aims to speed drug development.

Janet Woodcock, deputy commissioner of the F.D.A., said developing genetic markers “requires groups to work together because there’s no entity really charged with developing them.”

Still, there are now so many collaborative efforts that there is a risk of what is being called consortium fatigue. Mr. Holden said he found financially burdened drug makers less willing to join the new organization than the one he helped start in 1999.

A meeting of the American College of Clinical Pharmacology this month in San Francisco featured a symposium with presentations on the Biomarkers Consortium, the Predictive Safety Testing Consortium, the Molecular Assays and Targeted Therapies Consortium, the Cardiac Safety Consortium and the Microarray Quality Consortium.

Mr. Holden said the new Serious Adverse Events group would rely largely on DNA samples that European academic researchers had already collected from people who suffered the severe liver toxicity or Stevens-Johnson syndrome after taking drugs.

Using DNA analysis chips, researchers will examine those patients’ DNA at one million different spots, comparing it with the DNA of control subjects, to look for variations between the groups. The DNA of about 2,000 people will be analyzed, with results available in a year or two, Mr. Holden said.

The raw results would require further studies to show if the markers really do predict who might suffer the side effects. It is possible that no such markers will be validated.

Even if relevant genes are identified, it might not be economically possible to test all patients to screen out side effects that show up in as few as one in 100,000 people. Such economic factors are one reason that pharmacogenetics, the practice of tailoring drug therapy to patients using genetic tests, has been slow to catch on.

 

Do you want a similar Paper? Click Here To Get It From Our Writing Experts At A Reasonable Price.

Should women in the military be given front-line combat duties

Do you want a similar Paper? Click Here To Get It From Our Writing Experts At A Reasonable Price.

Topic: Should women in the military be given front-line combat duties?

Thesis: Women in the military deserve to be given front-line combat duties.
(A thesis expresses the author’s point of view on the topic and comes at or
near the end of the introduction paragraph)

Main point 1: The first reason women deserve frontline combat duties is
equality. (Developed in body paragraph)

Main point 2: The second reason women deserve combat duties is their
great teamwork. (Developed in body paragraph)

Main point 3: The third reason women deserve these duties is their proven
courage. (Developed in body paragraph)

Conclusion: Give women the chance they deserve.

Do you want a similar Paper? Click Here To Get It From Our Writing Experts At A Reasonable Price.

Riccucci discusses diversity as not only a good thing to do, but also good for business (the bottom line

Do you want a similar Paper? Click Here To Get It From Our Writing Experts At A Reasonable Price.

Please provide a response to one of the below questions and respond to another post. 

  • Riccucci discusses diversity as not only a good thing to do, but also good for business (the bottom line). Do you agree with this statement? Why or why not?
  • Frederickson presents Lipset’s argument that American individualism has fundamentally shaped our ethos towards equity. Do you agree? Why or why not? How?
  • Frederickson presents Michaels’ argument that diversity is a second order effect of equity. Do you agree? Why or why not? How?

 

Do you want a similar Paper? Click Here To Get It From Our Writing Experts At A Reasonable Price.